Ray Kurzweil – Futurist

Post to Twitter

Amazon.com

This entry was posted in Finds and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Ray Kurzweil – Futurist

  1. ParkwayDriveHorizons says:

    @ TheReasonableLogic Make no mistake Kurzweil is Reptilian.

  2. xpennock says:

    I’m not so enamored with man’s technological capabilities that I ignore the fact that our efficient extraction / use of resources is inherently entropic. Complex systems tend to be diffuse and inefficient (think of a healthy forest ecosystem for true complexity). We’re a fucking monoculture and our house of cards is stacked very high. We’re animals who evolved “in the service of entropy to redress a hydrocarbon energy imbalance” to closely paraphrase Kurt Cobb.

  3. OxygenBurglar says:

    Ray Kurzweil Does Not Understand The Brain.

  4. TheReasonableLogic says:

    This guy is full of shit, I like Kurzweil and what he’s contributed to science and music. But what he’s saying is not factual, he has all the signs of the common lie, from the sweating to rolling his eyes and his body language. This shit is actually creepy wtf is wrong with is eyes? That is not normal. Maybe he’s already part man / computer. Understand that the technology that we get publicly is not the same technology guys like him have. They had technology that’s new to us now years back.

  5. misdelivery says:

    Average 12 year old? Errr …

  6. anaurafire says:

    @ 4everkeimThat’s because like my own parents, they are only really steeped in Religious nonsense. They aren’t open like you and I to extrapolating technological progress and searching for the possible implications.

  7. gherkinspeiler says:

    @ SlyamkenI don’t think you understand. These choices come from a good understanding of myself, not a need to figure myself out better. I don’t see how being happy requires revision.

  8. JG129 says:

    @ Scotti3Pipp3n Pardon my ignorance because I just stumbled on a copy of the age of spiritual machines a few days ago so this is all new to me, but do you think a machine will ever be able to be conscious? Will they ever be able to question reality and what the universe it is? Don’t get mr wrong I hope what he preaches actually happens but i’m not to sure if machines would ever be able to acquire our consciousness. It seems that we can program them and they can further problem solve.

  9. slyamken says:

    @ Gherkinspeiler maybe you should rethink your life and your ambitions then

  10. timen1986 says:

    @ SisK0211In the technological singularity isn’t part for “better”; only “different”:)

  11. timen1986 says:

    @ BelgianGuristaYou doubt that part because he touched his nose?!

  12. timen1986 says:

    I would love to connect my brain to ray’s brain and just chill with him.guess i have to wait 30 more years before i can

  13. gherkinspeiler says:

    @ TolstoievskyYes, I am for real. I am trying to get a job so I can actually have a place in September, but if not, I will start walking the nation. It seems like it could be an adventure.I always have looked back on the past times, and said that times were good. Even when bad things happened, I can look back and say that was a good time in my life. If this is true, then now is also a good time in my life.Happiness comes from within.

  14. Tolstoievsky says:

    @ Gherkinspeiler =))))))) omg what a great reply. Are you for real?

  15. OxygenBurglar says:

    Mike Treder – in his articles for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies – completely rips Kurzweil’s arguments into shreds. The exponential growth of technological progress will be sidetracked by ethical, economic, political and environmental issues.

  16. BelgianGurista says:

    22:47 His body language is telling that he makes a wild assumption. He touches his nose after a statement. And that happens when ppl make a lie or a wild assumption. I don’t think it’s a lie, but an assumption in this case.Hmm I’d like to know the actual algorithm that is hardwired for bodylanguage and why we do it. Gotta wait another 10 years then ye? Meh.

  17. Scotti3Pipp3n says:

    You said “machines cannot reproduce”. Well, if you mean reproduce as in creating “life” biologically, then sure. But what is “life”? A conscious minded being that is self-aware? So actually, AI robotics will be able to reproduce. That’s inevitable – It will ultimately be by AI robotic “reproduction” that furthers the creation of more intelligent and sophisticated AI.

  18. TheFlamingDoh says:

    @ Buzznandes To answer your questions-We already compete with machines.-Yes; they already do work for us.-I don’t understand that question,- Yes, but they will become an outcast because society will deem it strange.- No, machines cannot reproduce.-Possibly to do the paperwork and make decisions, but an actual human would be needed to keep humanity’s trust in the government.

  19. Tnias13 says:

    If we could only have minds like Ray Kurzweil grow exponentially as well, imagine the possibilities …..

  20. speedysavant says:

    @ SisK0211 That’s not quite how it’ll be. If we can build self-replicating nanobots, there’s no reason why * everyone * can’t have them, as much as they want. We’ll be post-scarcity. Hard to wrap your head around, but it’s an important part of the singularitarian image.

  21. diakrite says:

    The great thing of this vid is that Mr Kurzweil ALSO gives good thought to the negatives of technology. Something his “critics” always conveniently forget to mention.

  22. SisK0211 says:

    I am scared that intelligence will become a luxury and not a gift from a mother nature …It will be something like: Oh, man stfu, I have better nano bots in my brain, you are no match to my intelligence … You are poor = you are stupid

  23. gherkinspeiler says:

    @ SVBarnardThe future will never be better if you can hate your life now. Happiness can only come from within. No amount of external things can change your actual happiness level.I am not a virgin (but I haven’t had sex in years), but I also have no job, no money, and I live with a friend on his extreme charity. I have eaten leftovers for over a month.Yet, I am happy.

  24. xalspaero says:

    @ PrimalAnarchy your profile indicates you are in favor of anarchy and opposed to technology … um lmao.also you’re using technology to voice your opposition to it … ironic?

  25. PrimalAnarchy says:

    What a horrible, despicable man this is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Security Code: